Necessary Truth and Grammatical Propositions
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
States, Events, and Truth-makers
In the last decade, the debate about the ontological foundations of reified temporal logics (RTLs) has been relatively quiet, even though we think some problems still exist. In this paper, we identify some of these problems and propose (partial) solutions to them in a FOL framework. States are here characterized (at the syntactic level) as truth-makers of propositions—they reify true propositio...
متن کاملFormal Ontology, Propositional Identity and Truth According to Predication With an Application of the Theory of Types to the Logic of Modal and Temporal Propositions
Standard philosophical logic tends to reduce propositions to their truth conditions. However it is quite clear that propositions with the same truth conditions are not the contents of the same attitudes and acts of thought. We can think that Paris is the capital of France without eo ipso thinking that Paris is the capital of France and not a real number. So we need a finer criterion of proposit...
متن کاملLearning to Solve Complex Propositions: Does knowledge of truth-values bootstrap modal operators?
Evaluating complex propositions requires evaluating truthvalues and assigning modal operators. Previous research suggested that evaluating truth-values may be the key to assigning modal operators. This study placed 111 third and fifth grade children in one of three training conditions: no training, training truth-value assignment, and training truthvalue and modal operator assignment. The resul...
متن کاملDeductive Reasoning
Deductive reasoning is the kind of reasoning in which, roughly, the truth of the input propositions (the premises) logically guarantees the truth of the output proposition (the conclusion), provided that no mistake has been made in the reasoning. The premises may be propositions that the reasoner believes or assumptions that the reasoner is exploring. Deductive reasoning contrasts with inductiv...
متن کاملTowards a Possibilistic Logic
In this paper, we investigate how linguistic information can be incorporated into classical propositional logic. First, we show that Zadeh’s extension principle can be justified and at the same time generalized by considerations about transformation of possibility measures. Using these results, we show how linguistic uncertainty about the truth value of a proposition leads to the introduction o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008